for your analysis,consider how your text relates to the theory you have chosen. Think of this as looking at the text through glasses/lensesthat reveals aspects of the text that you couldn’t see before you started. Or think of it as putting your text intoone end ofa “theory machine” that spits something out at the other end. What comes out on the other side is what you need to describe in your paper.Remember, you are providing YOUR interpretation,using a theory YOU have chosento analyze a text YOU picked. That means that you will have to defend your analysis by arguing for it. Make a cohesive argument for your view. Don’t just write what you think, write WHY you think it.Do NOT make any claimswithout either making an argument for it yourself, providing evidence, or citing a source. There is no set number of sources you need to cite,but claims need to be substantiated, so you either have to argue for it yourself or provide a source. Be critical and careful when you choose your sources.Start by exhausting the class material before you draw on sources from outside the coursesyllabus. If you’ve never heard of the website containing some information you want to cite, it is probably not a good source.Use Scholar.google.cominstead of regular Googleto find sources. Do not cite Wikipedia. Wikipedia isa good place to begin your research,but use the sources mentioned in the Wikipedia entry (references are at the bottom) rather than Wikipedia itself. Length:Between 8and 10pages including references/bibliographyand front page matter, but excludingappendices.