InstructionMini-Paper This chapter focuses on our limited ability to evaluate information and predict the future of technological change. Pick the prompt that inspires you: Wikipedia is incredibly useful... for specific topics (it fairs poorly for philosophy). Analyze Wikipedia by detailing its strengths and weaknesses, then explain why it’s generally not considered a reliable source for research. Do you agree with this? Describe two of the neo-Luddite criticisms of technology. Do you agree? Why or why not? What is the singularity? Do you think it is an issue that we should be addressing today? Or is it a waste of time and resources that could be better spent on more immediate concerns. Mini-Reply Post a reply to the paper after yours in the forum. If your paper is the last one - you got it - reply to the first submission in the forum. The reply should be 300-400 words. Start by briefly thanking the author and saying something positive about the paper you are commenting on. Then respond to the paper. This could be a critique, you could extend the argument, fill in details, or apply one of the ideas in a different context. Finally, end by again saying something positive about the paper and summarizing your comment in a sentence or two. Be respectful! The goal is to learn from the exchange, not to score gotcha points. Ideally, everyone involved grows from the back and forth.