Scenario You are a junior credit analyst at Merrilton Bank, which has branches across several states in the United States. Your supervisor has called a team meeting and shared the agenda from leadership in the attached “Merrilton Bank Case Study.” Your supervisor has asked each team member to write a response to leadership’s agenda items that will ultimately propose an infrastructure to support the new loan program. Your supervisor will utilize the team’s feedback to prepare for the meeting with the bank’s executives and other leadership. Requirements: Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. The originality report that is provided when you submit your task can be used as a guide. You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course. Tasks may not be submitted as cloud links, such as links to Google Docs, Google Slides, OneDrive, etc., unless specified in the task requirements. All other submissions must be file types that are uploaded and submitted as attachments (e.g., .docx, .pdf, .ppt). Using the attached “Merrilton Bank Case Study,” analyze the bank’s data governance status and gaps and provide recommendations for a meeting agenda by doing the following: A. Describe the status of the Merrilton Bank’s essential data governance components about people, technology, process, and content. B. Describe data governance gaps related to each of the four essential data governance components (i.e., people, technology, process, content) that manifested as a result of the current crisis in the case study and the recent opportunity to administer a new line of loans. C. Discuss the origins of the gaps identified in part B and the data governance opportunities to achieve data information and governance readiness to successfully administer new loan products, including the following: • the bank’s ability to respond to a sudden surprise of this magnitude based on the origins of the identified gaps • the bank’s readiness to effectively administer new programs based on the origins of the identified gaps • relevance of existing standards and processes for reporting, compliance, data protection, and security • opportunities to apply best practices to current and envisioned data governance elements, including processes and operations, to elevate the bank’s emergency readiness D. Provide recommendations for four agenda items from the case study that you will present in the team meeting from the scenario. 1. Justify each agenda item recommendation from part D in the context of the enterprise and the analysis you conducted in part C. E. Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized. F. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission. File Restrictions File name may contain only letters, numbers, spaces, and these symbols: ! - _ . * ' ( ) File size limit: 200 MB File types allowed: doc, docx, rtf, xls, xlsx, ppt, pptx, odt, pdf, txt, qt, mov, mpg, avi, mp3, wav, mp4, wma, flv, asf, mpeg, wmv, m4v, svg, tif, tiff, jpeg, jpg, gif, png, zip, rar, tar, 7z