The peer review should be at least 1 and half page single-spaced and not just a summary of what they wrote (you’re not doing a “book report”), rather a review of their paper in order to provide constructive feedback on their work Topics to include if applicable (you can come up with other things to write about as well.) Did you understand the information they conveyed? What is the most interesting thing that you learned from this paper? Did they cover a good array of questions within the topic they chose? (For example if they were discussing types of treatment did they go over all of the types of remedies for COVID-19, possible vaccines types, antibody / plasma treatments etc.) Do you have suggestions for other topics they could have talked about? Did they cover all of the ethical implications for the patients, population, health care workers and/or scientists involved if applicable? If they wrote the paper by portraying a role in the community did you agree or disagree with the role they were portraying? (They might have been role-playing and it’s okay to have different opinions if they have different views, just explain your own opinions respectfully.) Does the information that they researched affect you personally in any way and do you think it will in the future? How? Does the paper flow well? Is it easy to understand, and grammatically correct? If they included graphics were the graphics easy to understand? Did they provide enough references in the correct format and did they follow the guidelines for the research paper in general? If you have any criticism about the paper be sure to write it constructively and not in a hurtful manner. The grade for the peer review will be based on how you write your review as well as how well you follow instructions about posting your review to the forum post.