Last week you watched a video that discussed power in a variety of ways. For example, power might be thought of as the ability to achieve the ends one seeks -- or the ability to alter the behavior of other states. We also spoke of structure -- Waltz's term for the distribution of power (he calls it capabilities) in a system of states, and process -- Nye's term for the socio-cultural and institutional conditions that prevail over a state system. One key and often underappreciated issue is whether power in one domain -- military power, for example -- can translate into influence or power in other domains. Consider the military (hard) power of the U.S. Does this confer power or influence in other policy domains of the U.S.? These might include human rights, democracy promotion, trade or investment, or the operation of international bodies like the U.N. If the answer is yes, describe the domains of policy in which the U.S. can lean on military strength to increase their non-military influence. If the answer is no, describe which domain is immune from this and why.