For each individual response, you must consider medium, context, audience, motive and rhetoric (i.e. how is writing to the president of the university going to differ from writing an anonymous review on the internet?). This assignment contains four parts: 1. Write to SF State’s president, Dr. Lynn Mahoney, expressing your dissatisfaction with the way things are run at the bookstore. 2. Write an anonymous internet-based review (think Yelp, Reddit, etc.) airing out your frustrations with SF State’s bookstore. Perhaps consider what differences exist within the context of writing to the president versus an online medium. 3. Write to your friend who manages the bookstore, filling them in on the various complaints you’ve heard, as well as the things you’ve noticed that might drive away customers. 4. Finally, once you’ve written your three responses, write a reflection explaining your rationale behind each one: Please note, I have not listed specific mediums; this is because I want to emphasize that the medium of writing you select is part of the rhetoric. Choose wisely. · What was your motivation? · How did the audience influence your rhetoric/approach? · Why did you adopt the tone that you did? · Why did you choose the medium that you did? · What were you hoping to attain/prove by saying what you did? · What was at stake (if anything) when expressing your complaints? · What kinds of things did you have to take into account when writing each response?