Project Summary: Give a response to the following information min 350 words with empirical sources. The management of conflict in an interaction between two people can be observed by multiple parties yet be perceived in many different ways. Peoples emotional interpretation by observation differ due to what is called filters. Human beings may attempt to understand situational dilemma by a means of emotional comprehension that exists due to an inner understanding of interpretation. The construction of the parameters and causation of emotional understanding create a type of profiling or paradigm that structures the logical evaluation of emotional reasoning. The approach to dilemmas by factoring in the parties individual paradigm may aid in not only finding a resolution but understanding the process that the individual interprets dilemma and the characteristically emotional variables that formulate the causation of the dilemma. The theory of how this applies to dilemmas does not always aid in a resolution as logical thinkers are able to remove emotion and use linear progression to formulate a solution. A study conducted by the University of Washington concluded that African-American children are influenced by their perception of success by academic failure amongst their peer groups (Howard, 2010). The study observed how the adolescent students were impacted emotionally by being out casted by peer groups when achieving academic success. The structure of the emotional filter form observers would seem counterproductive to individual success but the need for the particular age group to feel accepted amongst peers supersedes the need for individual achievement. The conflict of each child could also be directly related to their type of family influence pertaining to views of parental emotions of academic achievement. The students that placed their individual needs of success above their priority of social acceptance were observed to claim a raceless social filter of their own perception. This proved to cause social interaction dilemmas that followed throughout maturing with an absence of racial identity filters (Arroyo & Zigler, 1995). Evaluating the study by a T.R.I.P approach, it would seem that several goal interests would overlap but ultimately dismiss the possibility of meeting both paradigm interests. The Topic goal for the students would be social integration and acceptance based on personal academic success. The relational goal is to meet the personal goals will assimilating to peer groups. The identity goals for the group are for individual competency while ascending into social adjustment within their immediate environment. The process is a behavioral sequence of an age group that faces social challenges that are prioritized above a more tangible result in academic success. This is difficult for those involved conflict to foresee as the immediate impact of academics is not always present when their interactions with their peers most certainly is and in particular for that age group. Arroyo, C. G., & Zigler, E. (1995). Racial identity, academic achievement, and the psychological well-being of economically disadvantaged adolescents. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 903914. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.69.5.903 Howard, J. (2010). Social Psychology of Identities. Retrieved November 22, 2016, from University of Washington, http://www.uvm.edu/pdodds/files/papers/others/2000/howard2000a.pdf Paradigms & Perception. (1998). Retrieved November 22, 2016, from University of Hawaii, http://www.honolulu.hawaii.edu/instruct/natsci/science/brill/sci122/Programs/p3/p3.html