Loading
Rating:
Date: 10/12/2016
Feedback Given By: User_10397
Feedback Comment: if there was 0 i would give him he didn't read the instructor very well i missed the deadline because of him and i ask him to do it again, which he did but he still didn't do what i asked for i would never work with him and i don't recommend him to anyone
Project Details
Project Status: Completed
This work has been completed by: Essaymasters
Total payment made for this project was: $40.00
Project Summary: Rhetorical analysis You should look at how this article does or does not persuade its audience. Writing the Rhetorical Analysis Paragraphs (2) Topic sentence that clearly indicates what strategy you are analyzing (and whether you think the article is effective/persuasive in this strategy) Well-developed paragraph including evidence to support your idea in the topic sentence, and you must include the target audience analysis in the E of your PIEs (you must develop at least 3 PIEs in each paragraph) Concluding sentence and another two Structure of response paragraphs Topic sentence using Academic Conversation Templates. At least 3 points with support to illustrate your response to the authors idea. Concluding sentence. How to Use the Templates if Your Response is With the Grain and You want to Support Your Response by Extending the Argument to a Different Context (this model can be applied to any of the templates) From the Academic Conversation Templates p. 3, Agree but Add Your Own Voice: Xs theory of _____ is extremely useful because it sheds insight on the difficult problem of _____. ____ = Authors Idea ____ = Your Response (the different context) [Author]s suggestion that [authors idea] is extremely useful because it casts light on the difficult problem of [your related idea that connects the authors idea to a different context without repeating the authors idea]. In this example, your response paragraph should develop 3 PIEs (or 3 IEs) about the yellow part. Your PIEs would discuss how the authors idea can be applied to a different context. you must use these as your three response topic sentence (Fred Wilson claims that the freed slave at the Monument was the only African- American image he was able to find, Although Fred wanted to recreate a sculpture with an African American individual within the piece other citizens could find this offending. Fred Wilson conceded that he wanted to create a sculpture that was similar to the previous sculpture but pictured an overall different meaning. By focusing on a different meaning individuals could have a different perspective of the artwork. Fred Wilson shows that the figure is solitary, leaning forward and supporting a flag symbolizing all the countries represented in the African diaspora. By focusing on the) these are the source you can you use in the response paragraphs Resources to help with WP2 responses More about Freds Wilson E Pluribus Unum: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nm3HA8rQYj8 http://blog.art21.org/2011/02/22/speaking-of-influence-a-monument%E2%80%99s-invisible-man/#.V_E0upMrLdQ Wilsons monument was controversial, but https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nm3HA8rQYj8 Wilsons sculpture should not be erected: http://www.indianapolisrecorder.com/opinion/article_60f824ad-b364-5e26-a5dc-75636e157cf7.htmlhttp://blogs.artinfo.com/modernartnotes/2011/07/anti-slave-rally-to-oppose-fred-wilson-project/ http://www.indianapolisrecorder.com/opinion/article_2e297372-45c8-11e0-9b3e-001cc4c002e0.html and last this is the article: http://www.nuvo.net/indianapolis/fred-wilsons-e-pluribus-unum-art-worth-arguing-about/Content?oid=1784460