Project Summary: 1. Las Casas argues that although the Indians are barbarian according to certain definitions, it does not follow that others must rule them. What does Las Casas offer as evidence that the Indians were not as barbaric as their enemies proclaimed? 2. How does Las Casas use historical and religious examples to turn the argument against those who would subjugate the Indians by force? 3. Also, how does las Casas make ethics a part of his argument?